Blogs

Consultant Firms - Tools

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks

Outcome Business War Games

Through the use of its proprietary method and software, Outcome can, with a high probability, predict b2b nego­tia­tion outcomes and ma­nage­ment decisions.

Outcome predict and improve outcomes of negotiations by means of spe­cially structured Business War Games that have been sci­en­tifically tested. The method used by Outcome has been scientifically proven to be the most accurate when pre­dic­ting outcomes of negotiations.

With Outcome's Business War Games, companies can:

• Predict the final outcome of negotiations
• Understand opportunities, threats and issues that may arise
• Identify and stress-test proactive strategies
 

Outcome Business War Games
Christiansvej 28
2920 Charlottenlund Denmark

Telephone: +45 27 28 39 18
E-mail: [email protected]

www.outcomewargames.com

Sample of Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies

 
Green, K. C. & Armstrong, J. S. (2011), “Role thinking: Standing in other people's shoes to forecast decisions in conflicts”. International Journal of Forecasting, 27, 69-80.

 

Schwarz, Jan Oliver. (2009), "Business wargaming: developing foresight within a strategic simulation". Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Volume 21, Number 3, pp. 291-305.

 

Tressler, David M. (2007), "Negotiation in the new strategic environment: Lessons from Iraq. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army.

 

Pinker, Edieal J. (2007), "An Analysis of Short-Term Responses to Threats of Terrorism". Management Science, Vol 5, No. 6. pp. 865-880.

 

Green, K. C. & Armstrong, J. S. (2007). “Value of expertise for forecasting decisions in conflicts”, Interfaces, 37, 287-299.

 

Green, K. C. (2005), “Game theory, simulated interaction, and unaided judgment for forecasting decisions in conflicts,” International Journal of Forecasting, 21, 463-472.

 

Trotman, Ken T. (2005),“Auditor negotiations: An examination of the efficacy of intervention methods”.The Accounting Review, Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 349-367.

 

Green, K. C. & Armstrong, J. S. (2005), ”The war in Iraq: Should we have expected better forecasts?” Foresight, 2, 50-52.

 

Miller, Ken & Don Brown. (2003), "Risk Assessment War Game (RAW)". US Army & University of Virgina.

 

Green, K. C. (2002).“Forecasting decisions in conflict situations: A comparison of game theory, role-playing, and unaided judgment”. International Journal of Forecasting, 18, 321-344.

 

Armstrong, J. S. (2002),“Assessing game theory, role playing, and unaided judg-ment,” International Journal of Forecasting, 18 (3), 345-242.

 

Armstrong, J. S. (2001). “Role playing: A method to forecast decisions.” In Armstrong, J. S. (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 15-30.

 

Armstrong, J. S. (2001).“Combining forecasts.” In Armstrong, J. S. (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 417-439.

 

Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., & Camerer, C. (1995). “Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining.” The American Economic Review, 85(5), 1337-1343.

 

Bennett, Robert J. (1991),“Simulated Negotiations: A Measure of their Effectiveness on Negotiated Outcome”. Navel Postgraduate School.

 

Singer, Alan E. (1990). "Forecasting Competitor's Actions: An evaluation of alternative ways of analyzing business competition". International Journal of Forecasting, 75-88.

 

Armstrong, J.S. (1987),”Forecasting Methods For Conflict Situations”, in G. Wright and P. Ayton (eds.), Judgmental Forecasting, 157-176.

 

Armstrong, J.S. (1980), “The Seer-Sucker Theory: The Value of Experts in Forecast-ing,” Technology Review, June/July, 16-24.

 

Schelling, T.C. (1961).“Experimental Games and Bargaining theory. World Politics, XIV(1), 47-68.

Sample of Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies
 
Green, K. C. & Armstrong, J. S. (2011), “Role thinking: Standing in other people's shoes to forecast decisions in conflicts”. International Journal of Forecasting, 27, 69-80.

 

Schwarz, Jan Oliver. (2009), "Business wargaming: developing foresight within a strategic simulation". Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Volume 21, Number 3, pp. 291-305.

 

Tressler, David M. (2007), "Negotiation in the new strategic environment: Lessons from Iraq. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army.

 

Pinker, Edieal J. (2007), "An Analysis of Short-Term Responses to Threats of Terrorism". Management Science, Vol 5, No. 6. pp. 865-880.

 

Green, K. C. & Armstrong, J. S. (2007). “Value of expertise for forecasting decisions in conflicts”, Interfaces, 37, 287-299.

 

Green, K. C. (2005), “Game theory, simulated interaction, and unaided judgment for forecasting decisions in conflicts,” International Journal of Forecasting, 21, 463-472.

 

Trotman, Ken T. (2005),“Auditor negotiations: An examination of the efficacy of intervention methods”.The Accounting Review, Vol. 80, No. 1. pp. 349-367.

 

Green, K. C. & Armstrong, J. S. (2005), ”The war in Iraq: Should we have expected better forecasts?” Foresight, 2, 50-52.

 

Miller, Ken & Don Brown. (2003), "Risk Assessment War Game (RAW)". US Army & University of Virgina.

 

Green, K. C. (2002).“Forecasting decisions in conflict situations: A comparison of game theory, role-playing, and unaided judgment”. International Journal of Forecasting, 18, 321-344.

 

Armstrong, J. S. (2002),“Assessing game theory, role playing, and unaided judg-ment,” International Journal of Forecasting, 18 (3), 345-242.

 

Armstrong, J. S. (2001). “Role playing: A method to forecast decisions.” In Armstrong, J. S. (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 15-30.

 

Armstrong, J. S. (2001).“Combining forecasts.” In Armstrong, J. S. (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 417-439.

 

Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., & Camerer, C. (1995). “Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining.” The American Economic Review, 85(5), 1337-1343.

 

Bennett, Robert J. (1991),“Simulated Negotiations: A Measure of their Effectiveness on Negotiated Outcome”. Navel Postgraduate School.

 

Singer, Alan E. (1990). "Forecasting Competitor's Actions: An evaluation of alternative ways of analyzing business competition". International Journal of Forecasting, 75-88.

 

Armstrong, J.S. (1987),”Forecasting Methods For Conflict Situations”, in G. Wright and P. Ayton (eds.), Judgmental Forecasting, 157-176.

 

Armstrong, J.S. (1980), “The Seer-Sucker Theory: The Value of Experts in Forecast-ing,” Technology Review, June/July, 16-24.

 

Schelling, T.C. (1961).“Experimental Games and Bargaining theory. World Politics, XIV(1), 47-68

Negotiation War Games can be used to prepare for virtually all negotiations (two or three party negotiations are preferable).

The method has been shown to generate significantly better predictions of negotiation outcomes compared to other popular methods. Negotiation War Games have also been shown to ensure significantly lower prices in procurement negotiations, and greater writedowns in auditor vs. client negotiations concerning obsolete inventory.

Often used in politics, Negotiation War Gaming has been used to prepare President Ronald Reagan for his negotiations with Gorbachev in Reykevik and Geneva in 1985 and 1986. Presidential candidate John Kerry used a Negotiation War Game to prepare for his first TV-duel with George W. Bush in 2002.

The NTC (National Training Center, Fort Irwin. Ca.) recommend that all U.S. and Canadian Army officers be trained in the method before deployment. 

Since 1811, intelligence services, the military, and politi­cal leaders have participated in War Games (structured, in­ter­active simulations, also known as role-play simulations) for the purpose of predicting and preparing themselves for the outcome and the consequences of the meeting with their adversaries. Business War Gaming is the generic term for the civilian versions of this thoroughly tested and fre­quent­ly applied intelligence method, which improves tacti­cal forecasting and strategic planning. A Business War Game is a role-play simu­la­­tion of a specific, business-related situation.

In a Negotiation War Game the company's own employees become involved in the actual analysis by acting partly as the company itself, partly as the other negotiating party. On the basis of an advanced forecasting method in which stake­hold­er information, issue understanding, and inter­active simu­lations are combined, the outcome of negotiations can be rendered probable and thus contribute to the company's handling of negotiations.
 

Who Uses The Method?

During the past 60 years, the method has proved indispensable to the major part of the US Fortune 500 companies. The most successful companies in the world have used the method to generate forecasts to better tactical and strategic decision making. The method is also frequently used by negotiation experts, because of the methods great accuracy when predicting outcomes of complicated negotiations. Finally the method is frequently used by the US army and CIA to predict the actions of terrorists and insurgents in critical situations.

Blogs

Books
Negotiations
Research
Tools
War Gaming History