"Imagine that eight people walk into a meeting to discuss an important strategic decision for their company.
They're all well-versed in the challenge they face.
But two members of the group hold some key piece of information or a perspective that not everybody has considered.
Everyone knows, for example, about the major trends in the industry that the boss has been talking about for months. They've seen the slide that shows last quarter's disappointing sales results a hundred times.
Only one person, however, knows about the recent moves of a competitor, while another has insights into an important emerging technology.
The whole point of getting everyone into a room, it would seem, would be to make sure that new information comes to the surface so the best decision can be made. In a workplace that values harmony and respect (and nearly all now do), that new information, sadly, will almost certainly get buried.
That's thanks to a pernicious and powerful quirk in group psychology called shared information bias."
"Shared information bias is known as the tendency for group members to spend more time and energy discussing information that all members are already familiar with (i.e., shared information), and less time and energy discussing information that only some members are aware of (i.e., unshared information).
Harmful consequences related to poor decision-making can arise when the group does not have access to unshared information (hidden profiles) in order to make a well-informed decisions." From Wikipedia.
Jonah Sachs thinks that this is a matter of being too nice when making a decision in groups.
For Most Fascinating Stories in Franchising, a weekly report, click here & sign up.
