1. Predict Performance:
Make sure that whatever system you're considering was actually designed to predict performance for the job, in this case, owning a franchise.
2. Designed for Selection or Recruitment
Make sure the system under consideration was designed for selection. Several of the most common personality profiles specifically state on their websites that they were not designed for selection.
One even goes so far as to say it's unethical to use it for selection. Even so, people are out selling these profiles for selection purposes.
3. Don't Discriminate in an unreasonable manner.
Third, make sure that the system you're considering does not discriminate. Even unintentionally. See Griggs v. Duke Power Co. A good summary is at
http://www.answers.com/topic/griggs-v-duke-power-co#ixzz32NTJOd4J
4. Verify Performance Carefully, using an Independent 3rd Party.
Unfortunately, there's no simple way to run an analysis between performance and "profile scores". No matter what you're told.
There's a fair amount of complexity involved in comparing scores and actual performance.
And by performance, I don't mean simply a gut feeling of they're good or bad.
That's subjective criteria because the ratings can change depending on who's doing the rating and their relationship to the franchisee. That's not to say you can't use subjective data, just that if it's available, use objective data with subjective thrown in.
Objective data is something to which you can relate to hard numbers.
Things like actual $ sales per location, % increase one year over the next etc. I've even had clients in auto repair use $ sales per bay.
It all works as long as you can put a hard number on it. Then you have to use rigorous scientific methods to analyse the relationships between "profile" scores and performance. Hopefully this analysis is done by a 3rd party with no stake in how the results turn out.
5. Include Everyone and Increase Sample Size.
You'll need to include good, bad and average performers.
Here's an example of what I mean: Let's assume you've just made a movie and want to project what your ticket sales will likely be.
If you only include good reviews you could say that 100% of the people that saw the movie like it.
True, but not accurate. Only by adding the bad and average do you get an accurate idea.
In the same scenario, how many people would you need to ask before you are comfortable with a projection? Five? Ten? Twenty-five? One hundred?
Generally accepted sample sizes are a minimum of 100 before you can accurately predict performance. Anything less than that and the best you could do would be to assume you've identified a possible trend.
As far a reliability is concerned, my definition is to be able to say with 95+% confidence that the there's a definite causal relationship between performance and profile scores.
With larger sample sizes, our confidence level could be 99.5% or even higher.
Having said that, it really boils down to what you're willing to accept as being reliable. Being able to predict accurately 50% of the time? 75%? 95%? What's your comfort level?
The bottom line is that it's simply not appropriate, accurate or legally defensible to just pick your
1. or 20 franchisees and base your decisions on that small a sample. Even if you include poor performers in the mix.
Having said that, if the system you're considering was developed to predict performance of franchisees in similar type of franchises, and can provide you with documentation of such, in all likelihood you'd be safe just going with the "template" already designed by the developer of the system.
Hope that answers your question Joe. Did I miss anything?
Hello, my name is Andrew and I am a principal of Synergy Sales & Marketing (an outsourced, more results based executive sales and marketing leadership team) and I have a confession to make...
I am a failure.
In fact, I am the CFO - the Chief FAILURE Officer for many corporations around the world!
Seriously, I am.
Rewarded more for the results rather than the services my firm provides and time it takes to render them, we have an extraordinary high tolerance for failure. A tolerance that over the years has enabled us to look at the very concept of failure in a different way. A way that has taught us a whole new truth. A truth that at first seemed implausible.
For those who are not in the sales and marketing profession, you should know that our profession is riddled with failure. In fact, it is more about failure than success. This is an indisputable fact. For example, well done direct mail campaigns yield a 3% conversion, social media advertising, less than 1/2 of 1%, sales, dozens maybe even hundreds of no's before you get your first yes.
Also, very often (an no matter how talented your marketing team is) website messaging is notoriously never right the first time or the second or the third... not resonating with its hyper-specific audience and buyers.
So, if this is the case, then why is every consultant, every book, every coach, every sales and marketing pro focused solely on how to do things the right way? Why are they all instructing us how failure is averted even though that "right way" still statistically yields a terrible result?
Well, something amazing happened. Or, should I say, I allowed it to happen. By allowing myself to have this intimate relationship with failure for over 10 years now, through the good times and the bad, I came to realize something. Something of paramount importance. Something that will cause you to at least pivot and very likely make a completely shift.
In the never ending process of always trying to "figure it out" I realized that predominance of our best solutions, our largest paydays came from those lessons in failure. I learned that:
- the faster and more frequently we failed,
- the better we emotionally detached from those failures,
- the better able to objectively observe the process of what failure could provide (give back), and,
- the faster and more frequently the solutions came to us.
- the fast solutions came, the faster the incremental, measurable results.
Ultimately what I observed is that failing, failing fast and failing often helped us find a way to significantly improve upon the present statistical paradigms. Most importantly, I realized that failure is not only a good thing, but if you can actually change how you (and everyone around you) feels about failure and control that process, the reward is almost limitless.
At Synergy, we change not only how our clients look at failure but how they FEEL about it. Leading by example we not only interrupt the corporate culture, we change how they all collectively feel about failure. And, what that new feeling engenders (spread person by person, task by task) is a collective willingness to fail.
A change in cultural behavior that renders the collective:
- Smarter than most,
- Faster than most, and
- Better than most.
Through massive yet compressed (expeditious) failure, our clients know better than anyone in their space how NOT to do it. They also know however, better than anyone else, how TO do it. How to figure it out faster; find that sweet spot faster. Succeed faster!
Success today, or scaled conversion as I like to call it (aka getting customers to buy in mass) has really become less about the practice of "here's how" and more about the science of "here's how NOT to". The science of allowing measured, controlled failure to reveal key learnings that ultimately allow for rapid and advanced solutions, adaptation and evolution. And by fundamentally changing how we all feel about failure... now that's where the real magic happens!
So yes, I am now a failure scientist. I like to call it that because I really am a former (environmental) scientist... a university adjunct professor in fact. I am, and always will be... a recovering geek! A recovering geek who realized that his talent was never actually doing the science but communicating it. Taking difficult subject matter and making it more easily digestible for people to understand and BUY!
I realized this because I started landing huge clients for the firm for which I was last employed many years ago. Then I landed MANY huge clients. It was at that time when I knew my calling was of all things, not science, but sales!
Now, I am a business man. An entrepreneur. A chief sales officer. And yes, the geek in me will tell you, a failure scientist. Sales and marketing departments are now my laboratory. Companies, leaders, hire me, hire us to figure it out. To actually figure out how to get people to buy... and buy in mass. They hire us not just build it and orchestrate it, they hire us make what we build and orchestrate WORK.
Leading my client's sales and marketing efforts, I have an awesome responsibility. A responsibility to pass on my wisdom. To lead them down a road less traveled than mine. And that responsibility has taught me more about courage, specifically the courage to not only say I fail but, I am actually good at it... and you should be too.
If you and your company truly embrace failure what you will find is that you will create an entirely different culture. A culture that embraces rapid change, adapts to it and reaps the rewards by creating incredibly inventive and rapid solutions. Something we a Synergy call The Culture Of Conversion.
Hello my name is Andrew and I am a failure and... A Chief Failure Officer.
---------------
For more about me, Synergy and Creating The Culture Of Conversion for your business go to my Linkedin profile at www.linkedin.com/in/resultsnow/
Beginning January 1, 2013, Employers were required to update the forms they use for securing employee background checks.
As we have discussed in this blawg on several occasions, performing an employee background check is not as simple as turning an employee's name, birth day¸ and social security number over to a credit reporting agency and waiting for the results.
Employers are bound to follow a prescribed set of steps when securing and using employee background checks. If you fail to follow the proper steps the consequences can be dire.
The prescribed steps are listed below:
1. Secure proper authorization for employee and applicants background checks.
2. Notify affected employees or applicants of intent to take any adverse employment actions based wholly or partly on a background check prior to taking any adverse action.
3. Notify affected employees or applicants of adverse decision.
The new form requirement is imposed in step 2.
Post January 1, 2013, employers are required to provide employees and applicants with a standardized form entitled A Summary of Your Rights Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
The form must be given prior to taking any adverse action against an employee or applicant (i.e. not hiring an applicant, denying an employee promotion, firing an employee). A copy of the prescribed form can be obtained by clicking here.
Ignoring the employer mandates regarding employee background checks is not a good idea. Employers can be subject to fines up to $1,000 or the actual damage for each violation plus attorney fees.
Most of you and your associates probably received the first paycheck already in 2013. It is less than it was last time, right? How much less? Have you multiplied the "loss" by the number of payrolls in 2013?
Well, I just got off the phone with someone making $150,000 a year, gross. The first paycheck in 2013 is about $344 less than the last one in 2012 was. There are 26 payrolls in 2013, so it means losing thousands of dollars this year.
Why? Because the temporary Social Security tax cut (also referred to as payroll tax cut) will not be extended for 2013. Therefore, everyone will see the Social Security withholding increase from 4.2% back to 6.2%.
In a nutshell, what does it really mean to you, a solo or small business owner?
- If you are a solo or small business owner who also made "capital infusions" or "loans" to your company, you will have less to lend.
- You have to spend wiser.
- Since other people are getting less money on their paychecks as well, they will spend less - or at least look closer before they buy goods or services. It means you have to focus on what you do best and spend more time with current and future clients.
What may be some reasonable steps to consider in 2013 bringing change to the way you do business but in a good way! Take a close look at your time management. What percentage of your time generates revenue? What are those tasks you do that would not generate revenue? Can you take them away from your list by having someone else doing them?
Would you be able to generate revenue (do you have enough clients or customers) to do revenue-generating activities if you get some or most of that time back?
If your answer to the last question was "yes", than you are looking at "delegating" work.
What type of activities are those you could take off the list? Let me guess: mostly administrative ones.
How would it be the most beneficial to delegate such work? You certainly do not want to spend more on office space or computers. You can't increase your overhead costs further by hiring a part-time full-charge office manager with full benefits to take the tasks over. But you need these tasks to be done, in a professional matter, not to mention ad-hoc tasks.
What is the easiest and most beneficial way to go from here? I recommend a consulting firm offering full-scale back-office services virtually. So you do not need to hire anyone and do not need more space to be rented. You would have your own accountant taking care of the books, who can also do the taxes and process payroll, invoice clients and customers. If you have any additional ad-hoc tasks, HR related (job advertising, background checks, ect.,), web service assistance, just to mention a few, you just pick up the phone and it is taken care of.
What does it mean to you? You are gaining more time that you can charge to clients so more revenue is generated. You have spent significantly less than what additional earnings you made to make it happen - so it was worth doing it. You are less frustrated with business administration because you do not have to worry about it.
You just promoted yourself benefiting YOU and your Clients.
My name is Sylvia Pacher, and I am always here to assist you along the way to grow your business bigger, stronger, more competitive and profitable.
Michigan, last week, became the 24th state to pass right-to-work legislation. A bit of a misnomer, the term “right-to-work” does not guarantee anyone’s right to work per se. What it does guarantee is that when employees choose not to join a union, they cannot be compelled to pay any union dues or fees as a condition of their employment.
In contrast, a “closed shop” would require that all workers join the union, and hence pay dues, as a condition of being hired.
While such completely closed shops were outlawed decades ago, the modified form that exists today permits a mandated fee payment to the union by those who choose not to join.
An argument against right-to-work is that all employees enjoy higher wages and better benefits as a result of the union and thus should contribute. The counter argument, and basis for right-to-work laws, is that choosing to join a union and pay dues to it, or not, is each individual employee’s basic right.
The passage of the right-to-work law in Michigan, and one earlier this year in Indiana, is significant because the mid-West has historically been a stronghold for union activity.
Right-to-work laws tend to have a weakening effect on unions. Many companies have relocated jobs to states that have right-to-work laws; it has been argued that the laws, therefore, have a positive effect on the economies and unemployment rates in those states.
For further information on right-to-work laws, subscribers to HRSentry may simply type right to work in the Search Box from their dashboard.
With year end almost upon us, human resources and payroll professionals are busier than ever! Reduce your administrative headaches by preventing problems. Check the list below to make sure you’re on top of important requirements and changes in the new year.
1. Report health insurance costs on W-2s. The 2012 W-2s that you issue in January, 2013 must reflect the cost of employer-sponsored health insurance in Box 12 with a code of DD. Note that small employers, i.e. those who issued less than 250 W-2s for 2011, have been given a one-year reprieve but are expected to report the cost in their 2013 W-2s to be distributed in January, 2014.
2. New Health FSA limit. The employee contribution limit for health flexible spending accounts is reduced to $2500 per year for plan years beginning in 2013 and beyond. Be sure to update your plan document and let employees know of the change. (Note that dependent care accounts are not changed.)
3. Social Security Tax Rate. Unless extended by Congress, the 2% temporary reduction in the social security tax rate is about to expire. Most likely, therefore, effective January 1, 2013 the rate will revert to 6.2% of wages up to $112,300 (an increase from $110,000.)
4. Additional Medicare Tax. If you have employees who earn more than $200,000 per year, you are required in 2013 to withhold an additional 0.9 percent Medicare payroll tax (an increase from 1.45 percent to 2.35 percent) to the amount of their pay that exceeds $200,000.
5. Loss of Adoption and Education Assistance Tax-free Status. The income tax exclusion of up to $12,650 in qualified adoption assistance and up to $5,250 in employer-provided tuition assistance are set to expire on December 31, 2012 unless extended by Congress. If applicable to your organization, let employees know about these likely changes. Consider ways to assist employees with educational reimbursements that qualify as a business expense.
6. Minimum Wage Increases. Where the state minimum wage exceeds the federal rate, you must use the higher wage. States with minimum wage hourly rate increases in 2013 are: Arizona $7.80; Colorado $7.78; Florida $7.79; Missouri $7.35; Montana $7.80; Ohio $7.85; Oregon $8.95; Rhode Island $7.75; Vermont $8.60; and Washington $9.19. The federal rate will remain at $7.25 per hour.
7. IRS standard mileage rate increases are as follows:
56.5 cents per mile for business miles
24 cents per mile for medical or moving purposes
14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations
8. Defined contribution retirement plan limits. Increased amounts for 2013 are:
Maximum elective deferral by employee $17,000
Catch-up provision limit for ages 50+ $ 5,500
Total maximium (employer + employer) $51,000
9. Health Savings Account/High Deductible Health Plan increases. Note the following HSA limits and related HDHP dollar amounts for 2013:
HSA contribution limit (employer + employee) $3,250 individual $6,450 family
HSA Catch up contribution limit (age 55+) $1,000
HDHP minimum deductible amounts $1,250 individual $2,500 family
HDHP maximum out-of-pocket amounts $6,250 individual $12,500
For a full year-end checklist, HR Made Simple subscribers may view the Year End Payroll & Benefits Checklist (under HR Topic Modules on the Knowledge Menu.)
Open enrollment for health and other benefit plans is one of the most hectic periods for HR departments. You can’t completely avoid stress, but you can take actions that will help the process go much more smoothly. For calendar year renewals, if you haven’t already, start now! Here are some important steps to reduce your headaches:
1. Engage brokers and providers. Work with your providers. They should help you evaluate alternatives as well as provide informational materials for your employees. Enlist their expertise to help educate employees and, if need be, upper management.
2. Get approvals. Obtain upper management approvals as soon as possible regarding the plans that will be offered and the amount of employer vs. employee contributions. Until you have those approvals it’s difficult to plan properly so make this happen as soon as possible. Be prepared to make recommendations and provide alternative scenarios and cost comparisons.
3. Forge a plan. Lay out actions to be taken for each benefit plan. Incorporate deadlines and new requirements into your planning and education efforts. This year there are Affordable Care Act (ACA) requirements to provide a Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC) to eligible employees at least 30 days prior to the plan renewal date following September 23, 2012 and to reduce the contribution limit to health flexible spending accounts (FSA) to $2,500 in 2013.
4. Communicate, communicate, communicate. Consider various methods to best reach all eligible employees. Email might be fine for office staff but it doesn’t work for employees who don’t use computers. Use a variety of methods to grab attention: email, intranet, posters, payroll stuffers, newsletters, home mailings. Communications should be clear and concise and highlight key information such as meeting dates, forms to use, and deadlines. Try, too, to drive home the point that this information is important to their well-being.
5. Educate, educate, educate. Benefits plans have become ever more complex in recent years and it’s important that employees truly understand the ins-and-outs of how plans work. If you have a high deductible health plan (HDHP) with commensurate health savings accounts (HSA) or health reimbursement arrangements (HRA,) it’s crucial that employees understand the complexities of how to use them legally and properly. Educational meetings should be held at different times to accommodate varying schedules.
Also, do consider hosting evening meetings for spouses as sometimes they are the ones making the benefits decisions. Make sure employees and their families understand such important facets of their health insurance plans as: deductibles, co-pays, coinsurance, preventative care coverage, required pre-approvals and referrals, cost differentials between in-network and out-of-network providers, and different tiers of prescription drug coverage. Their understanding will save you headaches later on! After all, when the insurance company does not cover a cost in the way the employee expected, to whom does (s)he complain?
6. Coordinate with Payroll. Make sure you know when enrollment and other benefits information needs to be provided to your payroll department and that your deadlines and planning reflect that timing. Ensure that 2013 IRS contribution limits are incorporated into the payroll system so the amounts are not exceeded. (To view these limits, click retirement plan limits and health plan limits.) Employees are disappointed when money they thought was deducted pre-tax needs to be taxed. That’s one headache you can prevent!
While the meatiest provisions of the Affordable Care Act take effect in 2014, there are some requirements to tend to right now. Make sure you are ready to comply with the following:
1. W-2s. Most employers need to make sure their 2012 W-2s (i.e. those issued in January, 2013) include the premium cost of their health care plan. Small employers, meaning those that issued fewer than 250 W-2s last year don’t have to comply until 2013, meaning the W-2s they will issue in January, 2014. The premium should be shown in Box 12 with the code DD and should include both the employer and employee share combined.
2. Medicare Payroll Tax–Beginning in 2013, high wage earners on your payroll, defined as those earning more than $200,000, will be subject to an increased Medicare payroll tax on the amount above that threshhold. The employer contribution will not change. Here’s an example: If Jane earns $300,000, her first $200,000 is taxed at the regular rate of 1.45%. The remaining $100,000, however, must be taxed at a rate that is .9% higher, 2.35%. Be sure to set up your payroll systems accordingly.
3. Summary of Benefits Comparison (SBC)–This form is due to employees on the first day of your first health coverage open enrollment following September 23, 2012. The SBC was designed to help employees better understand and compare their health insurance plan choices. So for plan years beginning January 1st, you will need to get these to employees by December 1st. Most likely your health providers will be able to create them for you to distribute to employees. Note that electronic copies are permissible but you must provide a hard copy upon request.
For the SBC template and everything you need to know about the Affordable Care Act, subscribers may refer to HRSentry’s Healthcare Reform Kit, under the HR-Related Modules under the Knowledge Menu.
October is National Disability Employment Awareness Month. Consisting of a national campaign to raise awareness about disability employment issues, this year’s theme is “A Strong Workforce is an Inclusive Workforce: What Can YOU Do?”
There’s no better time to remember how vital it is that employers engage in an interactive dialog with employees who have a disability. The interactive process, required by federal law, is basically a dialog between the employer and employee which helps them come up with a reasonable accommodation (that does not create an undue hardship for the employer) to help the employee perform his or her job. Again, the interactive process is required under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Just last week the EEOC filed suit against Regions Bank in Tennessee for age and disability discrimination. The bank fired a branch manager after she requested accommodation for a disability. The suit alleges that the bank refused her request for reasonable accommodation and failed to engage in the interactive process to accommodate and, further, that it treated younger managers more favorably.
The Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act (ADAAA) of 2009 greatly expanded the definition of who is considered to be disabled. The question, therefore, has shifted from being about whether someone is disabled to how the person can be reasonably accommodated. Employers should understand that, while they do not necessarily have to agree to a specific accommodation requested by an employee and they do not have to accommodate someone who is not qualified to do the job (with or without accommodation), they absolutely do need to engage in the interactive process.
HRSentry subscribers may find further information about complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (and the Amendments Act of 2009 which greatly expanded the definition of who is considered to be disabled) by logging in to the HRSentry dashboard. Under the Knowledge Menu, click on HR Topic Modules to find the ADA Kit
Last week a man shot a former co-worker in the head five times, killing him, before being killed himself by police. A number of bystanders were wounded during the exchange of gunfire that took place in front of the Empire State Building in New York City during the morning rush hour.
Apparently, the victim had previously filed a complaint against his assailant which had said he believed the man would try to kill him. The shooter, a clothing designer, had been fired from his job about a year ago and is said to have been upset that the man he shot had not sold enough of his designs.
On the heels of a shooting spree during a Batman movie showing in Colorado late last month and in a Sikh temple in Wisconsin earlier this month, we continue to be reminded of the possibility of extreme violence erupting during such every day activities as seeing a movie, attending religious services and going to work.
Not every tragedy can be prevented. However, risks can be reduced and sometimes the extent of a tragedy can be minimized.
Here are some basic steps employers can take to reduce the risk of violence in their workplace:
-
Take proper care when hiring and always check references;
-
Perform background checks of new hires if lawful and appropriate for the position;
-
Create an emergency plan that includes evacuation and communication strategies;
-
Institute a workplace violence policy.
Your workplace violence policy should let employees know of your commitment to providing a safe and intimidation-free workplace and that violent or harassing behaviors will not be tolerated.
It should prohibit weapons in the workplace and give examples of prohibited behaviors (such as shoving, pushing, threats of violence, harassing phone calls or emails, arson, etc.)
The policy should require employees who experience or witness violence or threats of violence to report them immediately. Always provide more than one reporting avenue in case one person is not available or in case the employee is uncomfortable reporting the problem to that individual.
It should be noted that a number of states have recently instituted laws whereby employers may not prohibit firearms and ammunition from being on their property, i.e. if they are locked in an employee’s vehicle in the parking lot, so check your state law. That said, you do have the right to prohibit guns or other weapons from entering the actual work space.
Subscribers to HRSentry may access workplace violence policy samples and many other samples and best practice recommendations among its thousands of helpful HR resources. Although not every tragedy can be averted, employers should do all they can to minimize their risks.
With the advent of warmer weather, company dress codes often relax. Many employees acknowledge the change of seasons with more comfortable, cooler, and cheerier summer fashions. Ideally, employee morale and the work environment become a bit more upbeat. But some staff members take the flexibility too far and push the envelope. Whether it's too much bare skin or the snapping sound of flip flops, inappropriate dress can quickly produce problems in the workplace. What can you do?
Start with a clear policy. Explain the business reasons for your dress code, e.g.: projecting a professional business image, ensuring employee safety, meeting customer expectations, providing employees with a positive work environment that limits distractions. Give specific examples about what is and what isn't acceptable. If you use the term business casual, define it and give examples of acceptable wear such as collared polo shirts and khakis. If casual dress is acceptable only on certain days of the week, such as "casual Friday," state that clearly. Provide examples of what you don't want employees to wear, e.g. cut off shorts, flip flops or spaghetti strap tops if that's the case.
Be prepared to enforce your policy consistently. Spotty enforcement can hurt morale and lead to an accusation of discrimination. That said, it's legitimate to have different standards for different groups of employees if they are based on sound business reasons. For instance, staff who have contact with customers might be required to dress more professionally than those who do not.
Know your rights and consider the legalities. Dress codes based on sound business reasons and societal norms are usually fine. Where it can get dicey is if your policy infringes upon a protected category such as a religion or when it has a disparate impact on a minority group. For example, a policy forbidding all head coverings could present a problem for a Muslim woman or a Jewish man. A policy that allows men to wear jeans in the workplace but not similarly situated women, is discriminatory. So think through the business purposes of your dress code.
Keep the lines of communication open. Listen to your employees' request. If someone has a problem, meet with that person directly to discuss their needs so the situation gets resolved quickly without escalating. If someone has a true need based on religion or some other personal necessity, be prepared to make a reasonable accommodation as long as it does not create an undue hardship or safety concern for your business.
This page is an archive of recent entries in the Human Resources category.
Hiring is the previous category.
Leases is the next category.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.